6 CORE MAC PRO VS 8 CORE FULL

Macworld reviews Apple’s new iMac Pro: ‘Mac Pro power in the shape of an iMac’ – January 19, 2018Īpple’s iMac Pro has a Thunderbolt 3 storage surprise for you – January 19, 2018 Craig Hunter reviews Apple’s 18-core iMac Pro: A bargain at $11,199 – February 3, 2018Īpple begins shipping 18-core iMac Pro units to customers – January 31, 2018

IMore reviews Apple’s new iMac Pro: Beauty of a beast – March 1, 2018Īrs Technica reviews Apple’s iMac Pro: It’s MUCH faster – February 18, 2018Īpple’s powerful iMac Pro is ready for the enterprise – February 16, 2018Īpple’s powerful new iMac Pro is actually cheaper than the original Mac – February 7, 2018Īerospace engineer Dr. MacDailyNews Take: If you’re in the market for such a beast, you likely know exactly which apps you need and how they’ll perform on machines with varied cores.

6 CORE MAC PRO VS 8 CORE FULL

See all of the benchmark results in the full article here.

iMac 5K 4-core: 2017 iMac 5K 4.2GHz Quad Core i7 (7700K), 64GB of 2400MHz DDR4 SO-DIMM, AMD Radeon Pro 580 (8GB) GPU Apple’s all new iMac Pro starts at $4999Īpple’s all new iMac Pro with rear case removed.

iMac Pro 8-core: 2017 iMac Pro 3.2GHz 8-Core Xeon W-2140B CPU, 32GB of 2666MHz DDR4 ECC SDRAM, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 (16GB) GPU.

iMac Pro 10-core: 2017 iMac Pro 3.0GHz 10-Core Xeon W-2150B CPU, 64GB of 2666MHz DDR4 ECC SDRAM, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 (16GB) GPU.

Morgan reports, “Compared to the fastest 2017 iMac 5K, the 8-core iMac Pro was 23% to 79% faster.” “Equally configured, the cost premium of the 10-core varies from 11% to 14%.” “The advantage of the 10-core iMac Pro ranged from 3% to 24%,” Morgan reports. We like to call it 'The Beast that refuses to die.“With the help of some remote mad scientists, we were able to collect more 10-core iMac Pro CPU intensive benchmarks to compare with our 8-core iMac Pro - both with the same Pro Vega 64 GPU,” Rob Art Morgan writes for Bare Feats. This week EditBuilder loaned us a 12-Core Mac Pro tower running at 3.46Ghz. Then there is the question, 'What do you have more of? Time or money?'ĬONCLUSION: The 2013 Mac Pro 12-core is superior to the 2013 8-core when running pro apps that stress both CPU and GPU. So in the long term, if time is money, the 12-core could prove to be an even better buy. If you were exporting a 90 minute RED clip, the 8-core would take an hour longer to complete the job. In that limited comparison, the 12-core is a better buy. In the Resolve Export and Full Premium playback, the 12-core was 29% faster. The 12-core costs 22% more that the 8-core. When comparing the 2013 Mac Pro 12-core to the 2013 Mac Pro 8-core, comparably equipped (32G RAM, 512G flash, dual D700s), the price difference is $1500. That leads to a discussion of price/performance. As you can see from the graphs, the 12-core excelled.

That's when we went to the 5K HD RED clip.

The initial Resolve tests with the popular Standard Candle project and asset showed an advantage for the 8-core, but we decided that was neither tough nor typical. In the case of DaVinci Resolve, every action featured on this page was both CPU and GPU intensive. They don't just stress the CPU or just stress the GPU. Lastly, we opened the RED 5K HD clip in REDCINE-X PRO (build 22.4) and exported 'Full Premium' Quality to QuickTime ProRes 4444 in HD 1920x1080. We imported the RED 5K HD clip into Final Cut Pro X 10.1.1 (with the help of RED Apple Workflow Plug-in) and Exported it as QuickTime ProRes 4444 in HD 1920x1080. Shifting gears, we used the 'Deliver' function to export the R3D clip to QuickTime ProRes 4444 in HD 1920x1080, with both 'Force sizing to highest quality' and 'Force debayer res to highest quality' enabled. Playback at 'Half Good' quality with 2 blur effects added. (LARGER number in Frames per Second means FASTER. Using a 289 frame RED Digital Cinema (R3D) 4800x2700 (5K HD) clip with 5:1 Compression Ratio, we performed the following tests:įirst we play the R3D clip without any color correction or effect nodes but at 'Half Good' RED Digital Cinema quality. NMP 8c D700s = 2013 Mac Pro 3.0GHz 8-core, 32G RAM, 512G flash storage, dual FirePro D700 GPUsĪll testing was done using the internal flash storage. NMP 12c D700s = 2013 Mac Pro 2.7GHz 12-core, 16GB RAM, 512G flash storage, dual FirePro D700 GPUs HYPOTHESIS: The 8-core is the 'sweet spot' in performance since most pro apps don't stress all the CPU cores and its cores are running at a higher clock rate.

6 core mac pro vs 8 core